Critical and popular reception Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle with India




1 critical , popular reception

1.1 response in india
1.2 review new york times
1.3 review wall street journal





critical , popular reception
response in india

the legislative assembly of gujarat, lawmaking body of gandhi s home state voted unanimously on march 20, 2011 ban great soul because of controversy. lelyveld has stated gay interpretation of work mistake. book not gandhi bisexual or homosexual. says celibate , attached kallenbach. not news.


review new york times

writing new york times, hari kunzru finds great soul judicious , thoughtful . lelyveld s book, writes, revelatory american readers may familiar rudiments of gandhi s life , readers, perhaps indian readers, better acquainted gandhi story book s portrait of man still challenging.


reports of passages within book regarding nature of gandhi , kallenbach s relationship prompted wall street journal ponder gandhi gay? kunzru times observes modern readers less familiar concept of platonic love may interpret relationship, in particular romantic-sounding letters, indicating sexually charged relationship. however, adds gandhi took vow of celibacy in 1906, both gandhi , people of india saw cornerstone of moral authority.


review wall street journal

british historian andrew roberts, in writing wall street journal, counters idea of celibacy, descriptions of gandhi s testing of vow of celibacy young women. quotes passages gandhi s letters kallenbach included in text, such how have taken possession of body. slavery vengeance support conclusion gandhi sexual weirdo along being political incompetent , fanatical faddist .


self-described extremely right-wing, roberts invective against mahatma gandhi must framed in appropriate context. roberts noted apologist brigadier-general reginald dyer, perpetrator of amritsar massacre, in soldiers of british indian army under dyer s command , on dyer s order, opened fire on innocent men, women , children engaged in non-violent protest, baisakhi pilgrims. roberts, in rationalization of massacre, makes clear how explicitly distinct own assessment of implications of actions committed on day general consensus among historians:


today s reactions dyer s deed of course uniformly damning ... if amritsar district, punjab region or southern india had carried on in revolt, many more 379 people have lost lives.


journalist johann hari has described robert s assessment, , subsequent back-peddling, extraordinary rationalisation killing women , children in cold blood, , rejected virtually other historians. after exposed passage roberts said: have never approved of massacring civilians.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discography Kassav'

Design Trinity Chain Pier

Squads 2015 Copa América